Ranked #4 by U.S. News & World Report, the Michigan Ross BBA Program is one of the best undergraduate business program in the world. Explore what makes our inclusive community of learners so unique.
At Michigan Ross, you gain more than just a first-class business education. Our collaborative, supportive, inclusive community enriches your experience, and sets you up with a lifetime network of friends across the globe.
The work of Michigan Ross faculty influences the world’s largest companies and global economies. Every day we’re creating real-world solutions for the most pressing challenges in our world.
Follow a monthly poll co-created by Financial Times and Michigan Ross for insights on how American voters perceive key financial and economic issues in the lead-up to the 2024 U.S. presidential election.
Complex Firm Structure Can Hurt Stock in Alliances
May 3, 2018
By Maxim Sytch
Image
Maxim Sytch
Matrix companies such as Procter and Gamble, Eli Lilly, General Electric or PepsiCo are more likely to enter into complex alliances with other companies because their very structure gives managers more confidence to collaborate in challenging situations.
Yet, a new study by Maxim Sytch, associate professor of management and organizations at the University of Michigan Ross School of Business, and colleagues finds that the stock market often penalizes companies for such collaborations because they are thought to have diluted strength by juggling complexity both inside and outside.
Sytch and co-authors Franz Wohlgezogen of the University of Melbourne and Edward Zajac of Northwestern University examined the effect of a firm's internal structure on its engagement in alliances with other companies and stock market reaction to the formation of those partnerships. The study will appear in an upcoming issue of the journal Organization Science.
A matrix structure is designed with multiple links across the company's customer, functional, geographic and product groups. You live in a matrix organization if you have more than one boss, such as when you report to both a geography leader and a product leader. Account manager positions and cross-functional teams are all elements of the matrix design, which has become more prevalent in recent years.
"Our tests revealed an intriguing pattern of results," Sytch said. "Matrix organizations are more likely to enter into alliances that include partners from different industries and incorporate various functions in the alliance, such as R&D, manufacturing, or marketing.
"Such alliances are particularly complex to manage: They engender severe coordination demands, knowledge sharing challenges, and conflicts of competing interests. Yet, the stock market largely penalizes matrix organizations for embracing such complex interorganizational collaborations."
Managers of matrix firms were less daunted than nonmatrix firms by entering into complex alliances. This is because the anticipated governance and relational challenges in those alliances largely reflect their daily managerial challenges inside matrix organizations.
"Yet, the matrix firms incur the double-complexity discount for entering into such alliances, especially when there is an anticipation of high coordination costs both internally, within a matrix, and externally, across multiple alliance functions," Sytch said.
"The negative investor response makes visible the practical concerns that exist in the market about the optimality of matrix firms' resource allocation choices. Matrix managers' confidence that matrix structures offer behavioral benefits for managing these partnerships effectively is not reflected in the expected returns by the market."
Maxim Sytch is the Michael R. and Mary Kay Hallman Fellow and an associate professor of management and organizations at Michigan Ross.
In the paper “ Women in Power: Clearing Pathways for Women to Rise to Positions of Organizational Leadership,” Schipani and her co-authors explore numerous benefits of including women in leadership roles in business and government. These benefits include enhanced economic performance, reputational...
Krishnan began developing a framework for connecting technology and business in the late 1990s. At the dawn of the “dot com” boom, his research primarily focused on how software design could improve business functions and make business technology integration more efficient. “At the time, there was a...